Summary
The ruling also targets counterfeit cricket merchandise being shared on social media platforms.
The decision aims to protect the athlete’s personal brand and prevent the public from being misled.
Key Points
3 points1
The court restrained the misuse of the cricketer’s identity.
2
Deepfake technology can create realistic but false visual content.
3
Fake merchandise can deceive fans and violate intellectual property rights.
New Words to Learn
10 wordscourt
a legal body that decides on disputes and issues orders
restrains
limits or stops something from happening
misuse
using something in an incorrect or harmful way
identity
the characteristics that make a person recognizable
deepfakes
synthetic media created by computers that appear real but are fabricated
Artificial Intelligence
technology that enables computers to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence
merchandise
products or items that are bought and sold
plea
a formal request made to a court
social media
online platforms where people share content and interact
fabricated
created or invented, not genuine
Want to learn even more? Click here to read the full story!
🔊 Reading Article
Kid-friendly voice